مقایسه کودهای زیستی و شیمیایی فسفاته بر رشد ذرت
پذیرفته شده برای پوستر
عنوان دوره: سیزدهمین کنگره زراعت و اصلاح نباتات ایران
نویسندگان
1ﺳﺎری، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﻛﺸﺎورزی و ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺳﺎری، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻋﻠﻮم زراﻋﻲ، ﮔﺮوه ﺑﻴﻮﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژی و اﺻﻼح ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎت ﺷﻴﺮاز، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻴﺮاز، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻛﺸﺎورزی، ﺑﺨﺶ زراﻋﺖ و اﺻﻼح ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎت،
2ﺳﺎری، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﻛﺸﺎورزی و ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺳﺎری، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻋﻠﻮم زراﻋﻲ، ﮔﺮوه ﺑﻴﻮﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژی و اﺻﻼح ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎت
3ﺷﻴﺮاز، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻴﺮاز، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻛﺸﺎورزی، ﺑﺨﺶ زراﻋﺖ و اﺻﻼح ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎت،
چکیده
آزﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ و ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ اﺛﺮ ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﺎرور 2 و 3 و ﻛﻮد ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺴﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺳﻮﭘﺮﻓﺴﻔﺎت ﺗﺮﻳﭙﻞ ﺑﺮ رﺷﺪ روﻳﺸﻲ و زاﻳﺸﻲ ﮔﻴﺎه ذرت در دو ﺳﺎل در ﻳﻚ ﻣﻜﺎن ﺻﻮرت ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. اﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ در ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻚ آزﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮرﻳﻞ ﺑﺎ 3 ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮر ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻮد در 5 ﺳﻄﺢ، ژﻧﻮﺗﻴﭗ در دو ﺳﻄﺢ و دو ﺳﺎل ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻃﺮح ﭘﺎﻳﻪای ﺑﻠﻮک ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺼﺎدﻓﻲ ﺑﺎ 3 ﺗﻜﺮار در اﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎه ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺨﺶ زراﻋﺖ و اﺻﻼح ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎت داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻛﺸﺎورزی داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻴﺮاز اﺟﺮا ﺷﺪ. در اﻳﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دو ﻧﻮع ﻛﻮد زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﺎرور 2 و ﺑﺎرور 3 ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪام ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰان g/ha 100 و ﻛﻮد ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺴﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺳﻮﭘﺮﻓﺴﻔﺎت ﺗﺮﻳﭙﻞ در ﺳﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ kg/ha 200 و 100 ،0 اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﺑﺬر ﻣﺎل ﻗﺒﻞ از ﻛﺸﺖ اﻋﻤﺎل ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن دادهاﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ در ﻣﻮرد اﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﻔﺎت اﻧﺪازهﮔﻴﺮی ﺷﺪه ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ اﺛﺮی ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ اﺛﺮ ﻛﻮد ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ داﺷﺘﻨﺪ و ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﻌﻨﻲ داری ﺑﻴﻦ آﻧﻬﺎ وﺟﻮد ﻧﺪاﺷﺖ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن دادﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ از ﺻﻔﺎت ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮی ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮد ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎی داﺷﺘﻨﺪ. ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮان ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮی ﻛﺮد ﻛﻪ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی زﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ و ﺑﺪون اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺻﻔﺎت ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ در ذرت ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮد ﺑﻠﻜﻪ در ﻣﻮرد ﺑﻌﻀﻲ از ﺻﻔﺎت ﺑﺎﻋﺚ اﻓﺰاﻳﺶ ﻛﻤﻲ آﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮد و ﻣﻲﺗﻮان اﻳﻦ ﻛﻮدﻫﺎ را ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮای ﻛﻮدﻫﺎی ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ در ﻣﺰارع ذرت ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺮد.
کلیدواژه ها
Title
A comparison between phosphate biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer on maize growth
Authors
Abstract
An experiment was carried out to determine and compare the effect of Barvar 2 and 3 phosphate biofertilizers and chemical fertilizer (triple superphosphate) on vegetative and generative growth of maize in two years. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design arranged in a factorial scheme with three replications in the research station of Crop Production and Plant Breeding Department, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University. The factors consisted of genotypes (Hido and 677), Fertilizers (biofertilizers and chemical fertilizer) and year (two years). In this research, two kinds of biofertilizers including Barvar 2 and Barvar 3 and chemical fertilizer at three levels, 0, 100 and 200 kg/ha were used. Biofertilizers were added to seeds before cultivation. The results indicated that there is no significant difference between biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer for most measured traits and the effect of biofertilizer was the same of chemical fertilizer effect if not more. Some traits were more affected by biofertilizers as compared to chemical fertilizer. On the basis of our results it can be concluded that using biofertilizers alone not only does not reduce plant growth and yield in maize, but also can effectively improve some traits in this plant. Hence, it can be suggested that biofertilizers such as Barvar, are suitable candidate for replacement of chemical fertilizers in some crops like maize.
Keywords
Maize, biofertilizers, chemical fertilizers, morphologic traits